Will envisions America’s future in Iraq
In a Washington Post op-ed on Monday, George Will, warned that the outcome of keeping American troops in
For the full article, click here.
~ Feet in the mud, head in the sky ~
In a Washington Post op-ed on Monday, George Will, warned that the outcome of keeping American troops in
For the full article, click here.
According to the UN Security Council,
Hatched at the formation of the Afghan National Assembly last December, realistic goals were set for
The rate at which reforms are implemented continues to be a major concern in
For the full article, click here.
Ayman Nour, a former Egyptian presidential candidate, appeared in court on Tuesday, IRIN reported on Friday. While currently serving a five-year sentence for fraud, Nour’s recent charges pertain to a supposed encounter with a member of the ruling party during the previous presidential election.
While the results of the trial have not been released, Nour was transferred to a hospital following the adjournment of the trial. He suffers from heart disease, and has been awaiting proper and necessary treatment since May.
For the full article, click here.
The following opinion piece was written by Ellen Lutz of Cultural Survival:
350 million people ought to be hard to sideline. But that is precisely what the United Nations General Assembly did on Tuesday November 28 to the world's indigenous peoples. In an assault dressed up to look like a harmless procedural measure, the General Assembly's Third Committee made it clear that indigenous peoples' human rights, abused for centuries, will have to wait for another day.
Called Indians, First Peoples, Aborigines, Eskimos, or the names they call themselves - Wampanoag, Pokomam, Batwa, or MakMak - indigenous peoples are among the poorest and most marginalized peoples on our planet today. Living in over 70 countries, they have their own cultures, languages, and unique connections to their lands.
Historically, genocide, disease, and forced assimilation destroyed indigenous peoples. Today their ways-of-life fall victim to national and international resource extractors, poorly considered development policies, and other aspects of economic globalization. Under the pretext that their cultures, which often differ radically from those of the dominant populations, are barriers to development, indigenous peoples are easy targets for discrimination and wholesale theft of their lands and resources.
If anyone on this planet needs international protection for their human rights, it is the indigenous. In 1982, indigenous leaders successfully appealed to the United Nations to form a working group to consider the human rights of indigenous peoples. The working group, which included states' representatives and indigenous organizations, spent the next 24 years wrestling over the concepts and language of a draft Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.
The text, which finally was presented to the new Human Rights Council last spring, includes indigenous peoples' rights to their traditional collective lands and resources, languages, religions, and cultures. Despite ardent objections by a handful of states, most notably the
Given the Human Rights Council's strong endorsement, approval should have been a matter of course at Tuesday's meeting of the General Assembly's Third Committee. But over the course of the fall, the declaration's opponents lobbied small states to vote against it. That effort paid off when
Packaged as a mere delay, the vote received no press coverage or wider attention. In fact, the tactic was designed to kill the declaration. No regular sessions of the General Assembly are scheduled after mid-December, and there is no budget authorized for a special session. Moreover, there is nothing in the resolution that would ensure indigenous peoples' participation in the committee's deliberations.
Why was the declaration shot down? At least some African states are concerned that it does not define "indigenous" and that it supports "self-determination" for indigenous peoples. Those states take the view that all Africans are indigenous, and that self-determination - one of the key points of the declaration - only applies to nations trying to free themselves from the yoke of colonialism. While fair concerns, the declaration, which is not legally binding, is clear that the meaning of these terms must be defined in context and negotiated between indigenous peoples and the state in which they live.
But the real impetus behind the initiative came from the same very powerful states that have objected all along. What they don't like is the language in the declaration that gives indigenous peoples rights to their lands and resources, and ensures their free, prior, and informed consent before those rights are impeded upon.
After the vote, the mood in the office of the Indigenous Peoples Caucus was despondent. Some called it a deplorable setback. Others remarked that it was a huge insult to the newly established Human Rights Council. After 24 patient years of hard work and playing by the rules, they felt angry and humiliated.
This is a very sad time for the world's indigenous peoples. Once again, the governments of the world have made it clear that indigenous peoples' rights are not as important as the interests of the world's most powerful states.
Shame on them!
To be connected to the Cultural Survival website, click here.
Iraqi President Jalal Talabani has rejected Kofi Annan’s suggestion of an international conference on violence in
For the full article, click here.
Tension between the conservative majority and secular minority in
The statement from the parliament comes after many women protested outside a Sunni Muslim institution. While Hosni has refused to apologize for his comments, he stated that he respects women’s ability to choose whether or not to wear a veil.
For the full article, click here.
This December marks the fifth anniversary of the
Indeed, the daily lives of Afghans haven’t been greatly altered. Unemployment is still rampant, widespread violence persists, and local officials continue to rule provinces with little regulation. These failures directly fuel the power of the opposition forces, such as the Taliban, which has risen to power in the southern provinces.
While international aid and support has poured into
For the full article, click here.
In a statement on Monday at the Arab Strategy Forum, Prime Minister Ahmed Nazif, announced new ratifications to the Egyptian constitution, according to Reuters. These changes, which are expected to take 18 months to establish, will replace the current emergency law with new anti-terrorism laws and amend the Egyptian power structure. In addition to giving more freedom to political parties, the amended constitution would also have provisions for presidential term limits. However, other constitutional provisions, notably stringent endorsement requirements for prospective independent presidential candidates, will not be changed. Regulations such as these have prevented opposition parties like the Muslim Brotherhood from nominating any potential candidates.
For the full article, click here.
Tales of beatings, forced marriage, and spousal infidelity, and thoughts of self-immolation are all commonly reported by women in
Since the overthrow of the Taliban in 2001, new government and civil society bodies dedicated to the protection of women’s rights have cropped up in
Medica Mondiale, a German human rights group, defends Afghan women charged with infidelity and other offenses. Since 2003, they have assisted in 750 cases. However, these types of services are limited in rural areas.
For the full article, click here.